q09·intermediate

How much ice has Greenland or Antarctica lost?

cryospheresea-levelclimate Datasets: 6 30–60 min
Find the data for your area

Draw a rectangle to pick your area of interest, then see what NASA data covers it (live, here in your browser) or download a ready-to-run notebook with your AOI pre-filled. The notebook runs in any Python environment — it needs a free Earthdata Login to fetch the data.

Current AOI: -50, 60 → -20, 80 (Greenland ice sheet (central))
On this page

How much ice has Greenland or Antarctica lost?

What you can answer

  • Total annual mass loss in Gt/yr (gigatons per year) from GRACE-FO
  • Surface elevation change in m/yr from ICESat-2 (the height-based view)
  • Spatial pattern of where loss is concentrated (West Antarctica, SE Greenland, etc.)
  • Sea-level rise contribution in mm/yr equivalent (1 Gt water = 0.00277 mm GSLR)
  • Acceleration of mass loss (the canonical Greenland trend goes from ~120 Gt/yr in 2002-2010 to ~280 Gt/yr in 2016-2022)

What you can NOT answer with these alone

  • Sub-glacier melt water flow without combining with surface meltwater products + climate models
  • Pre-2002 mass balance — that’s the GRACE era’s start; older estimates rely on InSAR + altimeter heritage
  • Individual outlet-glacier velocity — use ITS_LIVE (NSIDC) for that

Code template

import earthaccess
import xarray as xr
import icepyx as ipx
import pandas as pd

earthaccess.login(strategy="netrc")

# 1. GRACE-FO mass loss (the headline number)
greenland_aoi = (-75, 60, -10, 84)
grace = earthaccess.search_data(short_name="GRACEFO_L3_JPL_RL06.X_M",
                                bounding_box=greenland_aoi,
                                temporal=("2002-04-01", "2025-12-31"))
# Earlier GRACE for 2002-2017:
grace_old = earthaccess.search_data(short_name="TELLUS_GRAC_L3_JPL_RL06_LND_v04",
                                     bounding_box=greenland_aoi,
                                     temporal=("2002-04-01", "2017-06-30"))
# Sum mass anomaly × area density → Gt anomaly time series
# Fit linear trend → mass loss rate Gt/yr

# 2. ICESat-2 ATL06 elevation change (independent check)
region = ipx.Query("ATL06", greenland_aoi,
                   date_range=["2018-10-01", "2025-12-31"],
                   start_time="00:00:00", end_time="23:59:59")
# Use icepyx to query + open
# For each grid cell, compute dh/dt linear trend

# 3. Convert ICESat-2 elevation change to mass change
#    Assumes firn density model + bedrock geometry
#    (cross-validates the GRACE mass-loss estimate)

# 4. Plot: cumulative mass loss curve · spatial map of elevation change

Expected output

  • Cumulative mass-loss chart: Greenland from 2002 in Gt total
  • Spatial map: ice-sheet elevation change (m/yr) — colormap red/blue diverging
  • Sea-level rise contribution: Greenland’s annual rate in mm/yr (compare to global ~3.4 mm/yr total)
  • Acceleration: 2002-2010 trend vs 2016-2024 trend

Caveats

  • GRACE-FO 1° resolution is real. Don’t claim individual-glacier signals from GRACE alone.
  • ICESat-2 vs GRACE-FO disagreement on outlet glaciers is informative — GRACE captures meltwater export below the surface; ICESat-2 sees only the surface elevation.
  • Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) correction is essential. Use the JPL GIA-corrected mascon product, not raw.
  • Firn density assumptions in converting elevation to mass have ~10-15% uncertainty.
  • The 2017-2018 GRACE → GRACE-FO gap affects trend estimates spanning it.

Cross-DAAC composition

PO.DAAC (GRACE-FO) + NSIDC DAAC (ICESat-2) — both via earthaccess + Earthdata Login.

Sources

How a scientist answers this
Parameters
Ice-sheet mass change (gigatons, Gt) from GRACE/GRACE-FO mascons and surface-elevation change (m/yr) from ICESat-2 ATL06 (along-track) and ATL15 (gridded dh/dt); MERRA-2 surface-mass-balance context. Mass loss converts to sea-level contribution at ~360 Gt = 1 mm of global mean sea-level rise (≈0.00277 mm per Gt).
Method
Integrate the GRACE mass-anomaly field over the ice sheet to a Gt time series and fit a trend (and a quadratic to test acceleration) for the headline Gt/yr; independently, difference ICESat-2 surface elevations over time (ATL15 dh/dt) and convert volume change to mass with a firn/ice density assumption. The two methods are cross-validated against each other.
Validation
Compare the gravimetric (GRACE) and altimetric (ICESat-2) mass-loss estimates and against IMBIE community assessments; apply and report glacial-isostatic-adjustment and firn-density corrections (a major uncertainty); mind the GRACE/GRACE-FO gap and the coarse (~300 km) gravity footprint.
In plain EnglishMeasure how much the ice sheet weighs from space and how much its surface height is dropping, and combine them into tons of ice lost per year — then convert that into millimeters of sea-level rise. Two independent methods are compared so the number is trustworthy.

Make it yours → Edit the ice-sheet/basin bounding box, the date window, and the density assumption in the notebook to focus on Greenland, Antarctica, or a single drainage basin.

Run the core method · no login

The robust trend (Theil–Sen + Mann–Kendall) at the heart of this question — runnable on synthetic data, right here. The full earthaccess code template further down does it on real NASA data (needs an Earthdata login).

editable · runs in your browser

Datasets used